STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ONE-WEEK EXTENSION FOR PARTIES TO RESPOND TO RESPECTIVE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS

FIRST REQUEST

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.

Counsel for Plaintiff Westgate LVH, LLC and NAV-LVH, LLC ("Plaintiffs") by and through its attorneys of record at Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. and Greenspoon Marder, P.A. and Defendants, the Trustees of the Nevada Resort Association — IATSE Retirement Local 720 Pension Plan, through counsel at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, hereby stipulate and agree to a one-week extension for each party to respond to the other party's Motion for Summary Judgment filed in this matter. The parties filed their respective Motions for Summary Judgment on January 25, 2019 and currently the respective deadlines to file responses in opposition are set for February 15, 2019. The stipulated joint extensions would take the deadline for each parties' response to February 22, 2019.

Similarly, the Parties request that the deadline to file their replies in support of their respective motions for summary judgment be extended from March 1, 2019, until March 8, 2019.

This is the first joint request to extend the deadline for each party to respond to the opposing party's summary judgment motion.

A. DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS FILED

Plaintiffs and Defendants each filed their respective motions for summary judgment on January 25, 2019 (Dkts. 67, 68).

B. REASON EXTENSION IS REQUESTED

The Parties are requesting this extension due to extreme winter weather conditions that have affected Seattle, Washington, where lead Plaintiffs' counsel is located, that has resulted in office closures for multiple days from the large accumulation of snow. To ensure that both sides have ample time to respond to pending motions for summary judgment, Plaintiffs and Defendants each request a one-week extension to respond.

The requested extension is not made to delay this matter, but made in the spirit of good faith by both parties to ensure all each side has ample opportunity to complete and file responses to motions for summary judgment on file in this matter. Based upon the foregoing, the Parties believe there is good cause for the requested extension.

The parties continue to request that the date for filing the joint pretrial order be suspended until 30 days after the Court enters a ruling on the dispositive motion(s), or otherwise by further order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.