Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BELL v. U.S., 14-20140-Cr-COOKE (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20160229812 Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER PARTIALLY ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ISSUING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY MARCIA G. COOKE , District Judge . THIS MATTER was referred to the Honorable Patrick A. White, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to Administrative Order 2003-19 of this Court, for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters (ECF No. 3). On January 13, 2016, Judge White issued a Report of Magistrate Judge ("Repo
More

ORDER PARTIALLY ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ISSUING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

THIS MATTER was referred to the Honorable Patrick A. White, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to Administrative Order 2003-19 of this Court, for a ruling on all pre-trial, non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters (ECF No. 3). On January 13, 2016, Judge White issued a Report of Magistrate Judge ("Report") (ECF No. 10) recommending that (i) the Motion to Vacate Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 1) be denied, (ii) a certificate of appealability not be issued, and (iii) this case be closed. Ms. Bell filed objections to the Report on February 2, 2016. (ECF No. 11). I have considered Judge White's Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, and have made a de novo review of the record. I find Judge White's Report and Recommendation clear, cogent, and compelling on the merits of the case. But I do believe a certificate of appealability is warranted in this matter.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Judge White's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) with respect to the merits of the case is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Accordingly, the Motion to Vacate Sentence (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

It is FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, a Certificate of Appealability shall issue since I believe that, because of recent and pending developments with the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), "jurists of reason could disagree with the district court's resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 326 (2003); accord Lott v. Attorney Gen., Fla., 594 F.3d 1296, 1301 (11th Cir. 2010) (explaining that a "petitioner need not show he will ultimately succeed on appeal" in order to warrant a certificate of appealability).

DONE and ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer