Mosaic Potash Carlsbad, Inc. v. Intrepid Potash, Inc., 16-cv-0808 KG-SMV (2018)
Court: District Court, D. New Mexico
Number: infdco20181105g09
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES AND AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order [Doc. 140], filed on October 22, 2018. Plaintiff filed a Supplemental Opposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order [Doc. 142] on October 26, 2018. Defendants responded on October 29, 2018. [Doc. 143]. Plaintiff replied on November 1, 2018. [Doc. 146]. The Court heard argument
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES AND AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER STEPHAN M. VIDMAR , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order [Doc. 140], filed on October 22, 2018. Plaintiff filed a Supplemental Opposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order [Doc. 142] on October 26, 2018. Defendants responded on October 29, 2018. [Doc. 143]. Plaintiff replied on November 1, 2018. [Doc. 146]. The Court heard argument f..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES AND AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order [Doc. 140], filed on October 22, 2018. Plaintiff filed a Supplemental Opposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order [Doc. 142] on October 26, 2018. Defendants responded on October 29, 2018. [Doc. 143]. Plaintiff replied on November 1, 2018. [Doc. 146]. The Court heard argument from the parties at a hearing on November 2, 2018. The Court has considered the briefing, the relevant portions of the record, the parties' oral argument, and the relevant law. Being otherwise fully advised in the premises and for the reasons stated on the record at the November 2, 2018 hearing,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's Opposed Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order [Doc. 140] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case management deadlines set out in the Amended Scheduling Order [Doc. 117] are amended as follows:
Termination of fact discovery: December 17, 2018
Motions relating to fact discovery filed by: December 24, 2018
Plaintiff discloses experts and provides expert
reports or summary disclosures by: February 5, 2019
Defendants disclose experts and provide expert
reports or summary disclosures by: April 5, 2019
Termination of expert discovery: April 22, 2019
Pretrial motions other than fact-discovery motions
filed by: April 24, 2019
Proposed Pretrial Order due from Plaintiff to
Defendants by: May 8, 2019
Proposed Pretrial Order due from Defendants to
Court by: May 22, 2019
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
