Ely v. Cruiseport Curacao CV, 2:18-CV-01690-TSZ. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Washington
Number: infdco20190220f02
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER THOMAS S. ZILLY , District Judge . The Court is in receipt of the Parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendants CRUISEPORT CURACAO CV, HAL NEDERLAND N.V., HOLLAND AMERICA LINE-USA INC., and CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC without Prejudice, docket no. 9, with the understanding between the parties that the statute of limitations will not be asserted if it is later determined that a dismissed defendant is later brought back into the case. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
Summary: ORDER THOMAS S. ZILLY , District Judge . The Court is in receipt of the Parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendants CRUISEPORT CURACAO CV, HAL NEDERLAND N.V., HOLLAND AMERICA LINE-USA INC., and CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC without Prejudice, docket no. 9, with the understanding between the parties that the statute of limitations will not be asserted if it is later determined that a dismissed defendant is later brought back into the case. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED :..
More
ORDER
THOMAS S. ZILLY, District Judge.
The Court is in receipt of the Parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendants CRUISEPORT CURACAO CV, HAL NEDERLAND N.V., HOLLAND AMERICA LINE-USA INC., and CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC without Prejudice, docket no. 9, with the understanding between the parties that the statute of limitations will not be asserted if it is later determined that a dismissed defendant is later brought back into the case. Good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
The Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendants CRUISEPORT CURACAO CV, HAL NEDERLAND N.V., HOLLAND AMERICA LINE-USA INC., and CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC without Prejudice is hereby GRANTED. Defendants CRUISEPORT CURACAO CV, HAL NEDERLAND N.V., HOLLAND AMERICA LINE-USA INC., and CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC are hereby dismissed without prejudice, and the statute of limitations will not be asserted if it is later determined that the dismissed defendants are later brought back into the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
