Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HUMES v. HARMON, 2:18-cv-0426 JAM CKD P. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190910673 Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . On August 1, 2019, defendant Harmon filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Plaintiff will be ordered to file a response to the motion for summary judgment within 30 days. If plaintiff does not file a response, this action will be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Also, on August 12, 2019, plaintiff filed document titled "2nd Amended Complaint." However, plaintiff was not granted le
More

ORDER

On August 1, 2019, defendant Harmon filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Plaintiff will be ordered to file a response to the motion for summary judgment within 30 days. If plaintiff does not file a response, this action will be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Also, on August 12, 2019, plaintiff filed document titled "2nd Amended Complaint." However, plaintiff was not granted leave to amend, nor has he filed a motion explaining why leave to amend should be given. Therefore, the "2nd Amended Complaint" will be stricken.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendant Harmon's motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

2. Plaintiff's August 12, 2019 "2nd Amended Complaint" is stricken.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer