HURST v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 5:11-cv-455-Oc-10TBS. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120229941
Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 28, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is defendant's Unopposed Motion for New Scheduling Order (Doc. 17). Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), counsel for defendant represents that plaintiff's attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, defendant's motion is hereby GRANTED. Defendant shall have 60 days from the date plaintiff files her brief within to file defendant's brief. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant's Unopposed Motion for New Scheduling Order (Doc. 17). Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), counsel for defendant represents that plaintiff's attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, defendant's motion is hereby GRANTED. Defendant shall have 60 days from the date plaintiff files her brief within to file defendant's brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
