Layton v. Percepta, LLC, 6:17-cv-1488-Orl-41DCI. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20181030993
Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion to Conditionally Certify a Collective Action ("Motion," Doc. 53) and Defendant's Response in Opposition (Doc. 54). United States Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 55) in which he recommends that the Motion be denied. After a de novo review of the record, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees with the analysis set fo
Summary: ORDER CARLOS E. MENDOZA , District Judge . THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion to Conditionally Certify a Collective Action ("Motion," Doc. 53) and Defendant's Response in Opposition (Doc. 54). United States Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 55) in which he recommends that the Motion be denied. After a de novo review of the record, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees with the analysis set for..
More
ORDER
CARLOS E. MENDOZA, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion to Conditionally Certify a Collective Action ("Motion," Doc. 53) and Defendant's Response in Opposition (Doc. 54). United States Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick submitted a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 55) in which he recommends that the Motion be denied.
After a de novo review of the record, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees with the analysis set forth in the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 55) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion to Conditionally Certify a Collective Action (Doc. 53) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
