Berry v. Desert Palace, Inc., 2:17-cv-00019-GMN-PAL-APG-BNW. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20191008r26
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' SUBMISSION OF A REPLACEMENT BRIEF FOR THEIR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASED ON NEWLY PRODUCED DOCUMENTS [ECF NO. 136] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among Plaintiffs WILLIAM J. BERRY, JR., CYNTHIA FALLS, AND SHANE KAUFMANN ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant DESERT PALACE, INC., d/b/a CAESARS PALACE ("Defendant"), that Plaintiffs b
Summary: STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' SUBMISSION OF A REPLACEMENT BRIEF FOR THEIR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASED ON NEWLY PRODUCED DOCUMENTS [ECF NO. 136] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among Plaintiffs WILLIAM J. BERRY, JR., CYNTHIA FALLS, AND SHANE KAUFMANN ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant DESERT PALACE, INC., d/b/a CAESARS PALACE ("Defendant"), that Plaintiffs be..
More
STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' SUBMISSION OF A REPLACEMENT BRIEF FOR THEIR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF THEIR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BASED ON NEWLY PRODUCED DOCUMENTS [ECF NO. 136]
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among Plaintiffs WILLIAM J. BERRY, JR., CYNTHIA FALLS, AND SHANE KAUFMANN ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant DESERT PALACE, INC., d/b/a CAESARS PALACE ("Defendant"), that Plaintiffs be permitted to file a replacement to ECF No. 136, which is "Plaintiffs' Supplemental Briefing In Support of Their Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Newly Produced Documents." ECF No. 136. This replacement is requested because in filing their original supplemental brief on August 22, 2019, Plaintiffs incorrectly sought leave to file Exhibit 61 (Emails) and Exhibit 62 (Janiga's 2014 Tabulations) under seal. This new replacement supplemental briefing includes all of the exhibits properly categorized and properly redacted pursuant to the agreement between counsel with respect to sensitive and/or proprietary information.
The parties respectfully make this request pursuant to the Protective Order Regarding Confidential Discovery Materials [ECF No. 43], and submit that good cause exists for these minimal redactions in order to protect private, confidential, or proprietary information about Caesars Palace employees. By agreement, the redactions found in the replacement exhibits are limited to Caesars employees' personal phone numbers and the previously redacted (by Caesars) customer information.
MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER FELD LLP
/s/ Danielle J. Barraza /s/ Esther G. Lander
KATHLEEN J. ENGLAND ESTHER G. LANDER (pro hac vice)
Nevada Bar No. 206 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW
GILBERT & ENGLAND LAW FIRM Washington, DC 20036-1564
610 South Ninth Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
PATRICK H. HICKS
JASON R. MAIER Nevada Bar No. 4832
Nevada Bar No. 8557 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
DANIELLE J. BARRAZA 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Ste. 300
Nevada Bar No. 13822 Las Vegas, NV 89169
8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 SANDRA KETNER, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs William J. Berry, Nevada Bar No. 8527
Jr., Cynthia Falls and Shane Kaufmann LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
200 S. Virginia Street, 8th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
Attorneys for Defendant Desert Palace,
Inc. d/b/a Caesars Palace
ORDER ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
