Filed: Feb. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2016
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER H. KENNETH SCHROEDER Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This case was referred to the undersigned by the Hon. William M. Skretny, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), for all pretrial matters, and for hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications. Dkt. #64. Currently before the Court is plaintiff's motion to compel defendant Joseph Ciffa to produce documents demanded in plaintiff's First Request for the Production of Documents dated October 7, 201
Summary: DECISION AND ORDER H. KENNETH SCHROEDER Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This case was referred to the undersigned by the Hon. William M. Skretny, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), for all pretrial matters, and for hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications. Dkt. #64. Currently before the Court is plaintiff's motion to compel defendant Joseph Ciffa to produce documents demanded in plaintiff's First Request for the Production of Documents dated October 7, 2015..
More
DECISION AND ORDER
H. KENNETH SCHROEDER Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to the undersigned by the Hon. William M. Skretny, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), for all pretrial matters, and for hearing and disposition of all non-dispositive motions or applications. Dkt. #64.
Currently before the Court is plaintiff's motion to compel defendant Joseph Ciffa to produce documents demanded in plaintiff's First Request for the Production of Documents dated October 7, 2015. Dkt. #100.
Defendant did not respond to the motion to compel.
Upon review of the document demand served upon defendant's attorney (Dkt. #100-2, pp.5-9 & Dkt. #100-2, p.10 & 12), and communications from plaintiff's counsel seeking responses to the document demand (Dkt. #100-2, pp.14, 16, 18 & 22), and upon consideration of plaintiff's representation that defendant has failed to respond to the document demand or to any of his communications seeking a response to the document demand (Dkt. #100-2, pp.1-3), the motion to compel is granted.
Defendant shall produce the documents demanded, without objection, no later than March 25, 2016. Defendant is forewarned that his failure to comply with this Order will be deemed contempt of court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(vii).
SO ORDERED.
