Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lutz v. Saul, 2:19-cv-00024-DMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190805820 Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION FOR ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment be extended forty-five (45) days, from the current deadline, such that Plaintiff's new deadline, with the Court's approval, will be September 16, 2019. The parties are presently engaged in settlement discussions, and thi
More

STIPULATION FOR ADDITIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment be extended forty-five (45) days, from the current deadline, such that Plaintiff's new deadline, with the Court's approval, will be September 16, 2019. The parties are presently engaged in settlement discussions, and this extension of time is necessary to allow sufficient time for the Social Security Administration to consider Plaintiff's pending request to voluntarily remand this matter. With the Court's approval, the parties further stipulate that all other dates in the Court's Scheduling Order be extended accordingly.

Respectfully submitted, Dated: July 29, 2019 /s/ JARED WALKER Jared T. Walker, Attorney for Plaintiff SO STIPULATED: McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney Dated: July 29, 2019 By: /s/ *Tina Naicker (*authorized by email on 7/29/2019) Tina Naicker Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer