McALVEY v. ATLAS COPCO COMPRESSORS, L.L.C., 14-cv-0064-SMY-PMF. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20141125a80
Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 24, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STACI M. YANDLE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Union Carbide Corporation's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 262). Defendant Union Carbide Corporation filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on October 2, 2014. Plaintiff's response was due November 6, 2014. The plaintiff has failed to file a response to Defendant's Motion. The Court may, it its discretion, construe a party's failure to file a timely response as an admission of the merits of th
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STACI M. YANDLE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Union Carbide Corporation's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 262). Defendant Union Carbide Corporation filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on October 2, 2014. Plaintiff's response was due November 6, 2014. The plaintiff has failed to file a response to Defendant's Motion. The Court may, it its discretion, construe a party's failure to file a timely response as an admission of the merits of the..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STACI M. YANDLE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Union Carbide Corporation's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 262). Defendant Union Carbide Corporation filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on October 2, 2014. Plaintiff's response was due November 6, 2014. The plaintiff has failed to file a response to Defendant's Motion. The Court may, it its discretion, construe a party's failure to file a timely response as an admission of the merits of the motion, and the Court will do so in this case. See Local Rule 7.1(c) (requiring a response to a motion for summary judgment be filed 30 days after service of the motion and stating a failure to timely respond may be deemed an admission of the merits of the motion); see also Tobel v. City of Hammond, 94 F.3d 360, 362 (7th Cir.1996) ("[T]he district court clearly has authority to enforce strictly its Local Rules, even if a default results."). In conclusion, the Court GRANTS Defendant Union Carbide Corporation's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 262).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
