Filed: Dec. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2017
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING AND EXTEND TIME OF BRIEFING FOR MOTION TO DISMISS IT'S SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED Immigration Case LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner, by and through the attorney of record, and Respondents, by and through their attorney of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to the following: 1. Petitioner filed this action on April 23, 2017, and served the Petition on or about June 28, 2017. 2. Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING AND EXTEND TIME OF BRIEFING FOR MOTION TO DISMISS IT'S SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED Immigration Case LAUREL BEELER , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner, by and through the attorney of record, and Respondents, by and through their attorney of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to the following: 1. Petitioner filed this action on April 23, 2017, and served the Petition on or about June 28, 2017. 2. Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss ..
More
SECOND STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING AND EXTEND TIME OF BRIEFING FOR MOTION TO DISMISS IT'S SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED Immigration Case
LAUREL BEELER, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner, by and through the attorney of record, and Respondents, by and through their attorney of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to the following:
1. Petitioner filed this action on April 23, 2017, and served the Petition on or about June 28, 2017.
2. Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed on August 28, 2017.
3. The Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction was extended to be due to be filed by Petitioner on December 11, 2017. The current calendared hearing date for this motion is scheduled for January 4, 2018.
4. The parties believe that additional time for filing an opposition may facilitate resolution without the need for judicial intervention in this case. Both parties have indicated a willingness to work together to try to resolve this matter administratively, and agree that resolution will require some additional time.
5. This is the parties' second request for an extension of time, and the extension of time would affect no other deadlines in the case and is not for the purpose of undue delay.
6. The parties therefore request a continuance of the hearing date to April 26, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. with extension of time for filing the Opposition to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction to 21 days prior to the new continued hearing date and with extension of time for filing the Reply to the Opposition to 14 days prior to the new continued hearing date in this action.
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED.
