BUSBY v. COLVIN, 1:13-cv-00215-MP-GRJ. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150127b15
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER MAURICE M. PAUL, Senior District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 26, 2014. (Doc. 16). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed objections at doc. 17. Defendant has filed a response to Plaintiff's objections at doc. 18. I have made a de novo
Summary: ORDER MAURICE M. PAUL, Senior District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 26, 2014. (Doc. 16). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed objections at doc. 17. Defendant has filed a response to Plaintiff's objections at doc. 18. I have made a de novo ..
More
ORDER
MAURICE M. PAUL, Senior District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 26, 2014. (Doc. 16). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed objections at doc. 17. Defendant has filed a response to Plaintiff's objections at doc. 18. I have made a de novo review based on those objections and the response.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections and response thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. Contrary to Plaintiff's contentions, the Administrative Law Judge did not err by concluding that Plaintiff did not have a severe mental impairment at Step Two or by giving the opinion of Mary Ann Danker little weight or consideration.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. 16) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is AFFIRMED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
