AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Zurich American Insurance Company Second Motion for Writ of Garnishment After Judgment (Doc. 219). Plaintiff seeks a writ of garnishment against Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Garnishee").
Rule 69 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a money judgment is enforced by a writ of garnishment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 69(a)(1). "The procedure on execution . . . must accord with the procedure of the state where the court is located, but a federal statute governs to the extent it applies." Id. Florida law provides a right to a writ of garnishment to judgment creditors to help satisfy a money judgment. Fla. Stat. § 77.01. To obtain a writ of garnishment, the judgment creditor must file a motion stating the amount of the judgment. Fla. Stat. § 77.03. The writ must direct the garnishee to answer the writ within twenty (20) days and state the amount named in the judgment creditor's motion. Fla. Stat. § 77.04.
On July 21, 2017, Plaintiff obtained a judgment against Defendant Leasing Resources of America 4, Inc. ("LRA4") in the amount of $2,801,212. (Doc. 173). The full amount of the judgment remains due and owing. Based on the information provided to the Court, LRA4 maintains a bank account with Garnishee, and Garnishee may therefore be in the possession of funds belonging to LRA4. (Doc. 219).
Attaching a proposed writ that directs the garnishee to respond within twenty (20) days and that states the amount named in the judgment creditor's motion as required by statute, Plaintiff moves for a writ of garnishment against Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.
Accordingly and upon consideration, it is