ORDER

JAMES D. WHITTEMORE, District Judge.

BEFORE THE COURT are Defendant PennyMae Loan Services, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Dkt. 36), and Plaintiffs' response (Dkt. 41). Upon consideration, PennyMac's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 36) is GRANTED on the grounds that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. 31) is a shotgun complaint and will be dismissed.

A complaint should contain a "short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). This Rule does not require detailed factual allegations, but a plaintiff's complaint must contain more than unadorned or conclusory accusations of harm. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). The complaint must "plead all facts establishing an entitlement to relief with more than `labels and conclusions' or a `formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action.'" Resnick v. AvMed, Inc., 693 F.3d 1317, 1324 (11th Cir. 2012) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 554, 555 (2007)). "A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleaded factual content allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged." Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678 (citing Twombly, 550 U.S. at 556).

Each count of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. 31) purports to incorporate all sixty-one (61) paragraphs of general and factual allegations.1 "`Tonsequently, allegations of fact that may be material to a determination of count one, but not count four, are nonetheless made a part of count four. . . . [I]t is virtually impossible to know which allegations of fact are intended to support which claim(s) for relief.'" Paylor v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 748 F.3d 1117, 1125-26 (11th Cir. 2014) (quoting Anderson v. Dist. Bd. of Trs. of Cent. Florida Only. Coll., 77 F.3d 364, 366 (11th Cir.1996)). Indeed, some allegations are inconsistent with certain claims, but are nevertheless incorporated into those claims.2 The Eleventh Circuit has recognized the impropriety of shotgun pleadings for years. See id.; Jackson v. Bank of America, N.A., ___ F.3d ___, 2018 WL 3673002, at *3 (11th Cir. August 3, 2018); Weiland v. Palm Beach Cnty. Sheriff's Qffice, 792 F.3d 1313, 1321-22 (11th Cir. 2015). The proper remedy for a shotgun complaint is to strike the complaint and order a repleader. Weiland, 792 F.3d at 1321 n.10 (citing Wagner v. First Horizon Pharm. Corp., 464 F.3d 1273, 1280 (11th Cir. 2006)).

Accordingly, the Amended Complaint (Dkt. 31) is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of this Order.3 Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action without further notice.

DONE AND ORDERED.