PORTON v. SP ONE, LTD., 6:15-cv-566-Orl-40KRS. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150414821
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER PAUL G. BYRON , District Judge . This cause comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Rule 26 Disclosures and Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order (Doc. 27) filed on March 3, 2015. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted and that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 43). After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections w
Summary: ORDER PAUL G. BYRON , District Judge . This cause comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Rule 26 Disclosures and Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order (Doc. 27) filed on March 3, 2015. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted and that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 43). After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections we..
More
ORDER
PAUL G. BYRON, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Rule 26 Disclosures and Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order (Doc. 27) filed on March 3, 2015. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted and that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 43).
After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed,1 the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.
Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation filed March 19, 2015 (Doc. 43), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. The Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Rule 26 Disclosures and Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Court Order (Doc. 27) is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4. All pending motions (Docs. 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 45) are DENIED AS MOOT.
5. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate all deadlines and close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Report and Recommendation ("R&R") was mailed to Plaintiff on March 20, 2015. Subsequently, on March 24, 2015, Plaintiff filed what is entitled a "Motion for Rule 11, Discharge of Defendants['] Attorney[s]." (Doc. 45). The Court does not construe this filing to be an objection to the R&R, as it does not address any of the factual or legal findings made by the Magistrate Judge in her R&R. Moreover, the Court is aware that Plaintiff was arrested on April 2, 2015, fourteen days after the R&R was issued. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff is allowed fourteen days, plus three mailing days, to submit objections to R&Rs. Twenty-four days have passed since the R&R was issued and Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the R&R. Thus, it is ripe for the Court's consideration.
Source: Leagle
