Radiance Aluminum Fence, Inc. v. Marquis Metal Material, Inc., 18-12605. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20191029k88
Visitors: 27
Filed: Oct. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER [ECF Nos. 33, 38, and 57] R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on October 24, 2019, (1) Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order Pursuant to Rule 26 and to Quash Plaintiff's Third Party Subpoenas Pursuant to Rule 45 [ECF No. 33] is GRANTED. (2) Non-Party Shoreline's Amended Motion for A protective Order Pursuant to Rule 26 and to Quash Plaintiff's Third Party Subpoenas Pursuant to Rule 45 [ECF No. 38] is GR
Summary: ORDER [ECF Nos. 33, 38, and 57] R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on October 24, 2019, (1) Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order Pursuant to Rule 26 and to Quash Plaintiff's Third Party Subpoenas Pursuant to Rule 45 [ECF No. 33] is GRANTED. (2) Non-Party Shoreline's Amended Motion for A protective Order Pursuant to Rule 26 and to Quash Plaintiff's Third Party Subpoenas Pursuant to Rule 45 [ECF No. 38] is GRA..
More
ORDER [ECF Nos. 33, 38, and 57]
R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on October 24, 2019,
(1) Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order Pursuant to Rule 26 and to Quash Plaintiff's Third Party Subpoenas Pursuant to Rule 45 [ECF No. 33] is GRANTED.
(2) Non-Party Shoreline's Amended Motion for A protective Order Pursuant to Rule 26 and to Quash Plaintiff's Third Party Subpoenas Pursuant to Rule 45 [ECF No. 38] is GRANTED.1
(3) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's Motion to Compel Non-Party Elite Fence Products, Inc. to Comply with Subpoena Dated August 24, 2019 [ECF No. 57] is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Shoreline's original motion [ECF No. 36] was superseded by its amended motion [ECF No. 38].
Source: Leagle
