C-CATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. TIME WARNER CABLE INC., 2:14-CV-59-JRG-RSP. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20150409700
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2015
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP , District Judge . Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on March 5, 2015 (Dkt. No. 90) recommending denial of Casa Systems, Inc.'s ("Casa") Motion to Dismiss C-Cation Technologies, LLC's ("C-Cation") Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted (Dkt. 44). No objections having been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is adopted. A
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP , District Judge . Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on March 5, 2015 (Dkt. No. 90) recommending denial of Casa Systems, Inc.'s ("Casa") Motion to Dismiss C-Cation Technologies, LLC's ("C-Cation") Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted (Dkt. 44). No objections having been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is adopted. Ac..
More
ORDER
RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on March 5, 2015 (Dkt. No. 90) recommending denial of Casa Systems, Inc.'s ("Casa") Motion to Dismiss C-Cation Technologies, LLC's ("C-Cation") Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted (Dkt. 44). No objections having been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is adopted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion (Dkt. No. 44) is DENIED.
So ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
