Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BLAKELY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, 3:14cv34/MCR/CJK. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20150728891 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , Chief District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 24, 2015 (doc. 33). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objec
More

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 24, 2015 (doc. 33). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (doc. 28) is GRANTED.

3. Defendant's motion to compel (doc. 31) is DENIED AS MOOT.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer