Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Taylor, 3:13cr56/MCR/HTC (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20190712a94 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 28, 2019. ECF No. 77. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections, ECF No. 80. Having considered the Report and Recommendatio
More

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 28, 2019. ECF No. 77. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The Court has made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections, ECF No. 80.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 77, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, ECF No. 59, is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer