Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rooks v. Berryhill, CV 17-929 CG. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. New Mexico Number: infdco20181105907 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) CARMEN E. GARZA , Chief Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Stipulation Regarding Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, (Doc. 24), filed October 25, 2018, in which the parties state they have agreed to an award of $6,500.00 in attorney fees. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded $6,500.00 in attorney fees pursuant to the Equal
More

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Stipulation Regarding Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act, (Doc. 24), filed October 25, 2018, in which the parties state they have agreed to an award of $6,500.00 in attorney fees.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded $6,500.00 in attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591-93 (2010) (providing EAJA fees are paid to the prevailing party, not the attorney).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff's counsel receives attorney fees under both the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), Section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, Plaintiff's counsel shall refund the smaller award to Plaintiff pursuant to Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir. 1986).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer