Yalobusha County v. Enpro Industries, Inc., 3:19-cv-00046-GHD-JMV. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20190805593
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jul. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . These cases are before the court sua sponte for consolidation for discovery purposes and motion practice. 1 These cases were removed simultaneously; involve substantially the same defendants, plaintiff's attorneys, and defense attorneys; and both actions arise from the same incident and likely involve some common questions of law and fact. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED these cases are hereby consolidated for the purposes of discovery and motion pra
Summary: ORDER JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . These cases are before the court sua sponte for consolidation for discovery purposes and motion practice. 1 These cases were removed simultaneously; involve substantially the same defendants, plaintiff's attorneys, and defense attorneys; and both actions arise from the same incident and likely involve some common questions of law and fact. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED these cases are hereby consolidated for the purposes of discovery and motion prac..
More
ORDER
JANE M. VIRDEN, Magistrate Judge.
These cases are before the court sua sponte for consolidation for discovery purposes and motion practice.1 These cases were removed simultaneously; involve substantially the same defendants, plaintiff's attorneys, and defense attorneys; and both actions arise from the same incident and likely involve some common questions of law and fact.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED these cases are hereby consolidated for the purposes of discovery and motion practice.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. "A motion to consolidate is not required; the court may invoke Rule 42(a) sua sponte." Miller v. U.S. Postal Serv., 729 F.2d 1033, 1036 (5th Cir. 1984); see also Am. Home Assur. Co. v. Roxco, Ltd., 81 F.Supp.2d 674, 681 (S.D. Miss. 1999).
Source: Leagle
