SCHWARTZBERG TRUST v. ESTATE OF WALKER, 102 So.3d 675 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals of Florida
Number: inflco20121017184
Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2012
Summary: SILBERMAN, Chief Judge. The appellants, various named trust defendants in nursing home litigation, seek review of the trial court's order denying their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The facts and posture of this case are virtually indistinguishable from those in Schwartzberg v. Knobloch, 98 So.3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). For the reasons set forth therein, we conclude that co-personal representatives Ralph Edward Walker and Brenda Aleene Mole did not prove a basis fo
Summary: SILBERMAN, Chief Judge. The appellants, various named trust defendants in nursing home litigation, seek review of the trial court's order denying their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The facts and posture of this case are virtually indistinguishable from those in Schwartzberg v. Knobloch, 98 So.3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). For the reasons set forth therein, we conclude that co-personal representatives Ralph Edward Walker and Brenda Aleene Mole did not prove a basis for..
More
SILBERMAN, Chief Judge.
The appellants, various named trust defendants in nursing home litigation, seek review of the trial court's order denying their motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The facts and posture of this case are virtually indistinguishable from those in Schwartzberg v. Knobloch, 98 So.3d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). For the reasons set forth therein, we conclude that co-personal representatives Ralph Edward Walker and Brenda Aleene Mole did not prove a basis for long-arm jurisdiction over the trust defendants under section 48.193, Florida Statutes (2010).
Reversed and remanded.
NORTHCUTT and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.
Source: Leagle
