Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. BRANDE, 14-10029-CR-MARTINEZ. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20150224a79 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOSE E. MARTINEZ, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Order of Reference from the District Court to conduct a Change of Plea before a Magistrate Judge. THE MATTER was referred to Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow, on January 14, 2015. A Report and Recommendation was filed on February 2, 2015, [ECF No. 28], recommending that the Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted. During the Change of Plea hearing, the Magistrate
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOSE E. MARTINEZ, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Order of Reference from the District Court to conduct a Change of Plea before a Magistrate Judge.

THE MATTER was referred to Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow, on January 14, 2015. A Report and Recommendation was filed on February 2, 2015, [ECF No. 28], recommending that the Defendant's plea of guilty be accepted. During the Change of Plea hearing, the Magistrate Judge questioned the Defendant regarding his waiver of appeal in which the Defendant acknowledged on the record that he was waiving or giving up all rights to appeal any sentence imposed by the District Court in this case except under the limited circumstances contained within the appeal waiver provision from the Plea Agreement.

The parties were afforded the opportunity to file objections to the Report and Recommendation, however none were filed. The Court has reviewed the entire file and record and notes that no objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court affirms and adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 28] of United States Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow, is hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED in its entirety.

The Defendant is adjudged guilty to Counts 1 and 2 of the Information, which charges him in count 1 with conspiracy to violate the Lacey Act, in violation of Title 18 U. S.C. § 371, and count 2 with keeping false records, in violation of Title 16 U.S.C. §§ 3372(d)(1) and 3373(d)(3)(A)(i).

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer