Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SHAW v. TERRILL, 1:13-cv-00129-MP-GRJ. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20140506c25 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 01, 2014
Latest Update: May 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER MAURICE M. PAUL, Senior District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 20, 2014. (Doc. 29). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined
More

ORDER

MAURICE M. PAUL, Senior District Judge.

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated March 20, 2014. (Doc. 29). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 2. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 24) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as barred by the doctrine of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994); for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and for failure to prosecute. 4. Defendant Terrill's request for sanctions (Doc. 24 at 8) is DENIED. 5. The Clerk is directed to close this file.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer