GUENTHER v. McNEIL, 1:08cv241-MP-GRJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120323f14
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 16, 2012. (Doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any object
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 16, 2012. (Doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objecti..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, Chief District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 16, 2012. (Doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 1) is DENIED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED, pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.
Source: Leagle
