Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Perry v. Rohoho, Inc., 2:18-cv-668-FtM-38MRM. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20181120b59 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant Rohoho, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. (Doc. 12). Plaintiff Andrea Perry sues Rohoho for workplace discrimination. When Rohoho hired Perry, however, she agreed to submit to arbitration on such claims. (Doc. 12-1 at 3, 7). Consequently, Rohoho moves to stay this case and compel arbitration, which Perry does not oppose. After a review of the record and applicable law, the Cou
More

ORDER1

Before the Court is Defendant Rohoho, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. (Doc. 12). Plaintiff Andrea Perry sues Rohoho for workplace discrimination. When Rohoho hired Perry, however, she agreed to submit to arbitration on such claims. (Doc. 12-1 at 3, 7). Consequently, Rohoho moves to stay this case and compel arbitration, which Perry does not oppose. After a review of the record and applicable law, the Court grants Rohoho's motion.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

(1) Defendant Rohoho, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (Doc. 12) is GRANTED. (2) This case is STAYED until the parties advise the Court that (1) arbitration has been completed and (2) the stay is due to be lifted or the case is due to be dismissed. The parties must notify the Court of such matters within seven (7) days of the arbitration proceedings concluding. (3) The parties are further DIRECTED to file a joint report on the status of arbitration on or before February 19, 2019, and every ninety (90) days until the arbitration proceedings conclude. (4) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to add a stay flag on the docket.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer