ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#158) on April 10, 2013, in which he recommended the Court deny Plaintiff Timothy Barnes's Motion (#129) for Summary Judgment; grant the Motion (#132) for Summary Judgment of Defendants Chase Bank USA, N.A., and Chase Home Finance, LLC; grant the Motion (#135) for Summary Judgment of Defendants Federal National Mortgage Association and IBM Lender Business Process Services, Inc.; and prepare a final judgment. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc); United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988).
In his Objections, Plaintiff reiterates the arguments contained in his Memorandum in support of his Motion for Summary Judgment, his Reply, and his Responses to Defendants' Motions in addition to his arguments stated at oral argument. This Court has carefully considered Plaintiff's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
The Court
IT IS SO ORDERED.