Giterman v. Pocono Medical Center, 3:16-0402. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190403h54
Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER MALACHY E. MANNION , District Judge . In accordance with the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) The plaintiff's motion in limine , ( Doc. 94), to preclude WCC from introducing evidence it received a civil rights clearance letter from HHS is DENIED. (2) the plaintiff's motion in limine , ( Doc. 96), to exclude the expert testimony and report of Spinelli is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified in the foregoing memorandum. (3) Th
Summary: ORDER MALACHY E. MANNION , District Judge . In accordance with the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) The plaintiff's motion in limine , ( Doc. 94), to preclude WCC from introducing evidence it received a civil rights clearance letter from HHS is DENIED. (2) the plaintiff's motion in limine , ( Doc. 96), to exclude the expert testimony and report of Spinelli is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified in the foregoing memorandum. (3) The..
More
ORDER
MALACHY E. MANNION, District Judge.
In accordance with the memorandum issued this same day, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
(1) The plaintiff's motion in limine, (Doc. 94), to preclude WCC from introducing evidence it received a civil rights clearance letter from HHS is DENIED.
(2) the plaintiff's motion in limine, (Doc. 96), to exclude the expert testimony and report of Spinelli is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified in the foregoing memorandum.
(3) The plaintiff's motion in limine, (Doc. 97), to exclude the expert testimony and report of Sieminski is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified in the foregoing memorandum.
(4) WCC's motion in limine, (Doc. 105), to preclude the plaintiff from introducing any evidence regarding a "Golden Rule" argument is GRANTED as unopposed.
(5) PMC's motion in limine to exclude entirely or to limit the testimony Shepard-Kegl, (Doc. 101), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified in the foregoing memorandum.
(6) WCC's motions in limine to exclude entirely or to limit the testimony Shepard-Kegl, (Docs. 103, 107, 109 & 111), are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified in the foregoing memorandum.
Source: Leagle
