LIDDELL v. SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD OF TRANSITIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ST. LOUIS, 4:72CV00100 ERW. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20150922929
Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER , Senior District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on a Motion to Modify Consent Judgment [ECF No. 373] to approve an agreement between all parties and enter the agreement as a court ordered decree. The Court has reviewed the Joint Motion as well as the Agreement [ECF No. 373-4] and attachments thereto and approves all aspects of the Agreement and orders enforcement. The Court retains jurisdiction over the matter to enforce the provisions o
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER E. RICHARD WEBBER , Senior District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on a Motion to Modify Consent Judgment [ECF No. 373] to approve an agreement between all parties and enter the agreement as a court ordered decree. The Court has reviewed the Joint Motion as well as the Agreement [ECF No. 373-4] and attachments thereto and approves all aspects of the Agreement and orders enforcement. The Court retains jurisdiction over the matter to enforce the provisions of..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
E. RICHARD WEBBER, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a Motion to Modify Consent Judgment [ECF No. 373] to approve an agreement between all parties and enter the agreement as a court ordered decree.
The Court has reviewed the Joint Motion as well as the Agreement [ECF No. 373-4] and attachments thereto and approves all aspects of the Agreement and orders enforcement. The Court retains jurisdiction over the matter to enforce the provisions of the Agreement pursuant to Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Joint Motion to Modify Consent Judgment [ECF No. 373] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all aspects of the Agreement [ECF No. 373-4] are adopted herein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court retains jurisdiction over the matter to enforce the provisions of the Agreement and for such matters which may come before the Court.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
