Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Culpepper v. Walmart, Inc., 1:18-cv-01563 LJO JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190226856
Filed: Feb. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER TRANSFERRING THIS ACTION TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court ordered the parties to show cause why the action should not be transferred to the Central District of California. (Doc. 5) The Court noted that the plaintiff alleged that she suffered discrimination while working at two Walmart stores in Lancaster, California. (Doc. 1-1 at 5-10) The Court noted also that Lancaster is located in Los Angeles County, which is within the boun
More

ORDER TRANSFERRING THIS ACTION TO THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

The Court ordered the parties to show cause why the action should not be transferred to the Central District of California. (Doc. 5) The Court noted that the plaintiff alleged that she suffered discrimination while working at two Walmart stores in Lancaster, California. (Doc. 1-1 at 5-10) The Court noted also that Lancaster is located in Los Angeles County, which is within the boundaries of the Central District of California. Consequently, it appeared to the Court that the matter should be transferred. (See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a).)

The parties filed a stipulation indicating that the matter should be transferred to the Central District of California. (Doc. 6) Because all of the events occurred in the Central District of California, the Court ORDERS that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer