Gonzalez v. Jones, 2:15-cv-2448-TLN-KJN PS. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190327a57
Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . On March 25, 2019, the court conducted an informal telephonic discovery conference in this matter. 1 After carefully considering the amended joint letter and the parties' representations at the conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff is limited to propounding a total of 25 interrogatories on defendants, unless defendants stipulate to additional interrogatories or plaintiff obtains leave of court for any additional interrogatories u
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . On March 25, 2019, the court conducted an informal telephonic discovery conference in this matter. 1 After carefully considering the amended joint letter and the parties' representations at the conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff is limited to propounding a total of 25 interrogatories on defendants, unless defendants stipulate to additional interrogatories or plaintiff obtains leave of court for any additional interrogatories up..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
On March 25, 2019, the court conducted an informal telephonic discovery conference in this matter.1 After carefully considering the amended joint letter and the parties' representations at the conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff is limited to propounding a total of 25 interrogatories on defendants, unless defendants stipulate to additional interrogatories or plaintiff obtains leave of court for any additional interrogatories upon an appropriate motion.
2. Any other discovery requests, such as requests for admission, requests for production of documents, notices of deposition, or subpoenas, shall likewise comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and applicable law.
FootNotes
1. Although defendants did not agree that there were any discovery issues properly before the court, the court, in light of plaintiff's pro se status, nonetheless agreed to conduct the conference to see whether any discrete discovery issues could be addressed.
Source: Leagle
