LOMAX v. OTTEY, 15-7597. (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20160316087
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2016
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to defendants in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lomax v. Ottey , No. 8:14-cv-02180-DKC (D. Md. filed Aug. 4, 2015 & entered Aug. 5, 2015; Sept. 24,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to defendants in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lomax v. Ottey , No. 8:14-cv-02180-DKC (D. Md. filed Aug. 4, 2015 & entered Aug. 5, 2015; Sept. 24, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
James Meshach Lomax appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to defendants in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lomax v. Ottey, No. 8:14-cv-02180-DKC (D. Md. filed Aug. 4, 2015 & entered Aug. 5, 2015; Sept. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
