Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BROODNOX v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, 3:15cv425/MCR/EMT. (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20151216b73 Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , Chief District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 20, 2015. ECF No. 13. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, a
More

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 20, 2015. ECF No. 13. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. AT&T Mobility Services' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 7, is GRANTED.

3. Defendant "AT&T" is dismissed from this action.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer