IN RE MUSHROOM DIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 06-0620. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150923d93
Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER THOMAS N. O'NEILL, Jr. , District Judge . AND NOW, this 27th of August, 2015, upon consideration of opt-out plaintiffs' motion to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Rigoberto Lopez offered on behalf of defendant M.D. Basciani (Dkt. No. 641), M.D. Basciani's response (Dkt. No. 654), plaintiffs' reply (Dkt. No. 657) and consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law, it is ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as explained in the accompanying memora
Summary: ORDER THOMAS N. O'NEILL, Jr. , District Judge . AND NOW, this 27th of August, 2015, upon consideration of opt-out plaintiffs' motion to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Rigoberto Lopez offered on behalf of defendant M.D. Basciani (Dkt. No. 641), M.D. Basciani's response (Dkt. No. 654), plaintiffs' reply (Dkt. No. 657) and consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law, it is ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as explained in the accompanying memoran..
More
ORDER
THOMAS N. O'NEILL, Jr., District Judge.
AND NOW, this 27th of August, 2015, upon consideration of opt-out plaintiffs' motion to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Rigoberto Lopez offered on behalf of defendant M.D. Basciani (Dkt. No. 641), M.D. Basciani's response (Dkt. No. 654), plaintiffs' reply (Dkt. No. 657) and consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law, it is ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as explained in the accompanying memorandum of law.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that, because this Order and the accompanying memorandum of law may contain confidential information, they have been filed under seal pending review by the parties to permit the parties to meet and confer and propose a single jointly redacted version of the Order and the accompanying memorandum of law. On or before September 21, 2015, the parties shall provide the Court with any proposed redacted Order and accompanying memorandum of law or shall inform the Court that no redactions are required. Thereafter, the Court will issue a publicly-available version of this Order and the accompanying memorandum of law.
Source: Leagle
