SAVAGE v. MIT COMPUTERS, INC., 8:13-cv-932-T-30TGW. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20141205873
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Unilateral Two Week Extension of the Discovery Deadline or in the Alternative, For Reconsideration of the Court's Order Granting Extension of Time [D.E. 72] (Dkt. 73), Defendants' Response (Dkt. 74), and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Relief Requested in Defendants' Response [D.E. 74] (Dkt. 75). The Court, having reviewed the motions, response, and being otherwise advised in the
Summary: ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Unilateral Two Week Extension of the Discovery Deadline or in the Alternative, For Reconsideration of the Court's Order Granting Extension of Time [D.E. 72] (Dkt. 73), Defendants' Response (Dkt. 74), and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Relief Requested in Defendants' Response [D.E. 74] (Dkt. 75). The Court, having reviewed the motions, response, and being otherwise advised in the p..
More
ORDER
JAMES S. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Unilateral Two Week Extension of the Discovery Deadline or in the Alternative, For Reconsideration of the Court's Order Granting Extension of Time [D.E. 72] (Dkt. 73), Defendants' Response (Dkt. 74), and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Relief Requested in Defendants' Response [D.E. 74] (Dkt. 75). The Court, having reviewed the motions, response, and being otherwise advised in the premises, concludes that the Plaintiff's motion for extension of time should be granted in part and Plaintiff's motion to strike should be denied as moot. It is therefore
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for Unilateral Two Week Extension of the Discovery Deadline or in the Alternative, For Reconsideration of the Court's Order Granting Extension of Time [D.E. 72] (Dkt. 73) is granted to the extent that the deadline for all parties' fact discovery shall be extended by two weeks, to January 20, 2015.
2. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Relief Requested in Defendants' Response [D.E. 74] (Dkt. 75) is denied as moot.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
