WILLIAMS v. ASTRUE, 3:12-cv-533-J-99MMH-MCR. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120605857
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 07, 2012
Latest Update: May 07, 2012
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1 MONTE C. RICHARDSON, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) filed May 3, 2012. A review of the Affidavit of Indigency and the Complaint (Doc. 1) reveals that Plaintiff is a resident of Marion County Florida. As such, this claim should have been filed in the Ocala Division of the Middle District of Florida. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED: that this case be transferred to the Ocala
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1 MONTE C. RICHARDSON, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) filed May 3, 2012. A review of the Affidavit of Indigency and the Complaint (Doc. 1) reveals that Plaintiff is a resident of Marion County Florida. As such, this claim should have been filed in the Ocala Division of the Middle District of Florida. Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED: that this case be transferred to the Ocala ..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1
MONTE C. RICHARDSON, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) filed May 3, 2012. A review of the Affidavit of Indigency and the Complaint (Doc. 1) reveals that Plaintiff is a resident of Marion County Florida. As such, this claim should have been filed in the Ocala Division of the Middle District of Florida. Accordingly, it is respectfully
RECOMMENDED:
that this case be transferred to the Ocala Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida for all further proceedings.
DONE AND ENTERED in Chambers in Jacksonville, Florida this 7th day of May, 2012.
FootNotes
1. Any party may file and serve specific, written objections hereto within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS after service of this Report and Recommendation. Failure to do so shall bar the party from a de novo determination by a district judge of an issue covered herein and from attacking factual findings on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); Rule 72(b), Fed.R.Civ.P.; and Local Rule 6.02(a), United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
Source: Leagle
