Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BISHOP v. TUCKER, 3:10cv234/RV/EMT. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20120507526 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 07, 2012
Latest Update: May 07, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROGER VINSON, Senior District Judge. This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated April 18, 2012 (doc. 26). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections (doc. 28). Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the ti
More

ORDER

ROGER VINSON, Senior District Judge.

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated April 18, 2012 (doc. 26). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections (doc. 28).

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer