Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CAPASSO v. COLLIER COUNTY, 2:12-cv-499-FtM-38DNF. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20140801f12 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on review of the file. On April 8, 2014, the Court entered an Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order ( Doc. #27 ) directing the parties to complete mediation on or before August 7, 2014. On June 6, 2014, Plaintiff Susana Capasso filed a Notice of Mediation ( Doc. #35 ), informing the Court that the parties had agreed to mediate this matter on July 23, 2014. Since that time, the parties have failed to adv
More

ORDER1

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on review of the file. On April 8, 2014, the Court entered an Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order (Doc. #27) directing the parties to complete mediation on or before August 7, 2014. On June 6, 2014, Plaintiff Susana Capasso filed a Notice of Mediation (Doc. #35), informing the Court that the parties had agreed to mediate this matter on July 23, 2014. Since that time, the parties have failed to advise the Court as to the status of mediation. Also, under Middle District of Florida Local Rule 9.06(a), the mediator must file a written report with the Court indicating, among other things, whether the case was settled within five (5) days following the conclusion of the mediation conference. To date, the Court has not received any such report. The parties, therefore, are directed to comply with Local Rule 9.06.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The parties shall advise the Court on or before August 7, 2014, as to the status mediation in this case in accordance with this Court's Local Rules.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer