U.S. v. Jenkins, CR417-208. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20190529d45
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 28, 2019
Latest Update: May 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 588), to which objections have been filed (Doc. 590). In the report and recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends denying Defendant Jenkins's request to suppress certain intercepted communications. (Doc. 588.) After a careful review of the record, the Court finds that Defendant Jenkins's objections are meritless and concurs with the conclusions of the report and r
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR. , District Judge . Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 588), to which objections have been filed (Doc. 590). In the report and recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends denying Defendant Jenkins's request to suppress certain intercepted communications. (Doc. 588.) After a careful review of the record, the Court finds that Defendant Jenkins's objections are meritless and concurs with the conclusions of the report and re..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., District Judge.
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 588), to which objections have been filed (Doc. 590). In the report and recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends denying Defendant Jenkins's request to suppress certain intercepted communications. (Doc. 588.) After a careful review of the record, the Court finds that Defendant Jenkins's objections are meritless and concurs with the conclusions of the report and recommendation. Defendant Jenkins raises the same arguments in his objections that were fully considered by the Magistrate Judge in the report and recommendation. Accordingly, the report and recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case and Defendant Jenkins's Motion to Supress (Doc. 339) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
