Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McMaster v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 17-0319V. (2019)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20190502f73 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2019
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On March 8, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") as a result of receiving an influenza ("flu") vaccination on October 15, 2014. Petition at 1. On September 14, 2018, the und
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION ON ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS1

On March 8, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA") as a result of receiving an influenza ("flu") vaccination on October 15, 2014. Petition at 1. On September 14, 2018, the undersigned issued a decision awarding compensation to petitioner based on the parties' stipulation. ECF No. 38.

On January 8, 2019, petitioner filed a motion for attorneys' fees and costs. ECF No. 44. Petitioner requests attorneys' fees in the amount of $20,409.20 and attorneys' costs in the amount of $1,241.66. Id. at 1-2. In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner filed a signed statement indicating that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket expenses. Id. at 2. Thus, the total amount requested is $21,650.86.

Respondent did not file a response.

The undersigned has reviewed the billing records submitted with petitioner's request and finds a reduction in the amount of fees to be awarded appropriate for the reasons listed below.

I. Legal Standard

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. § 15(e). Counsel must submit fee requests that include contemporaneous and specific billing records indicating the service performed, the number of hours expended on the service, and the name of the person performing the service. See Savin v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 85 Fed. Cl. 313, 316-18 (2008). Counsel should not include in their fee requests hours that are "excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary." Saxton v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 3 F.3d 1517, 1521 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983)). It is "well within the special master's discretion to reduce the hours to a number that, in [her] experience and judgment, [is] reasonable for the work done." Id. at 1522. Furthermore, the special master may reduce a fee request sua sponte, apart from objections raised by respondent and without providing a petitioner notice and opportunity to respond. See Sabella v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 86 Fed. Cl. 201, 209 (2009). A special master need not engage in a line-by-line analysis of petitioner's fee application when reducing fees. Broekelschen v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 102 Fed. Cl. 719, 729 (2011).

The petitioner "bears the burden of establishing the hours expended, the rates charged, and the expenses incurred." Wasson v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 24 Cl. Ct. at 482, 484 (1991). She "should present adequate proof [of the attorneys' fees and costs sought] at the time of the submission." Id. at 484 n.1. Petitioner's counsel "should make a good faith effort to exclude from a fee request hours that are excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary, just as a lawyer in private practice ethically is obligated to exclude such hours from his fee submission." Hensley, 461 U.S., at 434.

II. Discussion

A. Hourly Rates

Petitioner requests compensation for attorney Joseph Pepper, at a rate of $331 per hour for time billed in 2018. ECF No. 44 at 17. Mr. Pepper was previously awarded the rate of $305 for time billed in 2018. See Chandler v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., No. 16-0322V, 2018 WL 3031053, (Fed. Cl. Sp. Mstr. April 4, 2018). The undersigned reduces the 2018 rate for Mr. Pepper to the previously awarded rate of $305 per hour for time billed in 2018. This results in a reduction of $13.00.

B. Administrative Time

Upon review of the billing records submitted, it appears that a number of entries are for tasks considered clerical or administrative. In the Vaccine Program, secretarial work "should be considered as normal overhead office costs included within the attorneys' fee rates." Rochester v. U.S., 18 Cl. Ct. 379, 387 (1989); Dingle v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., No. 08-579V, 2014 WL 630473, at *4 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. Jan. 24, 2014). "[B]illing for clerical and other secretarial work is not permitted in the Vaccine Program." Mostovoy, 2016 WL 720969, at *5 (citing Rochester, 18 Cl. Ct. at 387). A total of 5 hours was billed by paralegals on tasks considered administrative including, receiving documents, preparing for summarization, organizing, and mailing documents. Examples of these entries include:3

• July 21, 2016 (2.60 hrs) "review; organize; prepare medical records/exhibits 1-13 for summarization and electronic filing" • January 19, 2017 (0.30 hrs) "prep new records/Exhibit 16 for summary and electronic filing" • August 20, 2018 (0.20 hrs) "letter and stipulation to client via Fed Ex, copy of docs saved to case file" • August 30, 2018 (0.20 hrs) "Overnight shipment to DOJ; original stipulation sent to DOJ; copy of docs saved to casefile"

ECF No. 44 at 7, 13 and 15.

The undersigned reduces the request for attorney fees by $667.704, the total amount of the entries considered administrative.

III. Attorney Costs

Petitioner requests compensation of attorney costs in the amount of $1,241.66. This total includes costs for travel, medical records, postage and copies. The undersigned finds the overall amount of costs reasonable and awards the amount requested in full.

IV. Conclusion

Based on the reasonableness of petitioner's request, the undersigned GRANTS petitioner's motion for attorneys' fees and costs.

Accordingly, the undersigned awards the total of $20,970.165 as a lump sum in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and petitioner's counsel Ronald Craig Homer.

The clerk of the court shall enter judgment in accordance herewith.6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. These are merely examples and not an exhaustive list.
4. This amount consists of 3.5 hours at $135 per hour, 0.90 hours at $138 per hour and 0.50 hours at $142 per hour.
5. This amount is intended to cover all legal expenses incurred in this matter. This award encompasses all charges by the attorney against a client, "advanced costs" as well as fees for legal services rendered. Furthermore, § 15(e)(3) prevents an attorney from charging or collecting fees (including costs) that would be in addition to the amount awarded herein. See generally Beck v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 924 F.2d 1029 (Fed. Cir.1991).
6. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer