Filed: Apr. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINTAND STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Third-Party Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ("Third-Party Defendant") may have additional time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Third-Party Plaintiff's Compl
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINTAND STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Third-Party Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ("Third-Party Defendant") may have additional time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Third-Party Plaintiff's Compla..
More
ORDER RE STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINTAND STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Third-Party Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. ("Third-Party Defendant") may have additional time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Third-Party Plaintiff's Complaint. The parties have agreed to extend the response time for 21 days from the current due date, April 18, 2016, or up to and including, May 9, 2016. Good cause exists for this extension as the parties are engaged in settlement discussions regarding resolution of this matter, which, if successful, will obviate the need for a response. This is the second extension of time stipulated to by the parties.
Furthermore, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for April 26, 2016, pursuant to this Court's Order dated February 23, 2016. [D.E. 11]. In light of the parties' settlement discussions, they have further stipulated to a continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for April 26, 2016, to a date at the Court's convenience after May 9, 2016.
This document is being electronically filed through the Court's ECF System. In this regard, counsel for Defendant hereby attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) Plaintiff's and Third-Party Defendant's counsel has concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production if so ordered.
ORDER
The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Third-Party Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. may have up to and including May 9, 2016, in which to respond to Third-Party Plaintiff's Complaint.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for April 26, 2016, is continued to May 26, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9, before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to the conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
