GREEN v. CHAPMAN, CV612-009. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20120523b32
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 22, 2012
Latest Update: May 22, 2012
Summary: ORDER B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge. After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge s Report and Recommendation, to which Objections have been filed. In her Objections, Petitioner Pamela Green ("Green") asserts that the Magistrate Judge ignored the "manifest injustice" exception in his review of her 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition. Green also asserts that the Magistrate Judge failed to address her claim that the sentence is exc
Summary: ORDER B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge. After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge s Report and Recommendation, to which Objections have been filed. In her Objections, Petitioner Pamela Green ("Green") asserts that the Magistrate Judge ignored the "manifest injustice" exception in his review of her 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition. Green also asserts that the Magistrate Judge failed to address her claim that the sentence is exce..
More
ORDER
B. AVANT EDENFIELD, District Judge.
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the undersigned concurs with the Magistrate Judge§s Report and Recommendation, to which Objections have been filed. In her Objections, Petitioner Pamela Green ("Green") asserts that the Magistrate Judge ignored the "manifest injustice" exception in his review of her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Green also asserts that the Magistrate Judge failed to address her claim that the sentence is excessive and relies on a default rule.
The Magistrate Judge relied on appropriate statutory and case law in making his recommended disposition of Green's habeas corpus petition. Green's objections to the contrary are without merit.
The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Green's petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
