Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC,, 2:16-cv-01069-MMD-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171218a59 Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL [ECF NO. 33] AND MOTION TO AMEND [ECF NO. 34] CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Wells Fargo filed its Motion to Compel [ECF No. 33] and Motion to Amend Schedule [ECF No. 34] on November 30, 2017 ("Motions"). 2. SFR's Response to the Motions
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL [ECF NO. 33] AND MOTION TO AMEND [ECF NO. 34]

SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Wells Fargo filed its Motion to Compel [ECF No. 33] and Motion to Amend Schedule [ECF No. 34] on November 30, 2017 ("Motions"). 2. SFR's Response to the Motions are due on or before December 14, 2017. 3. The parties hereby stipulate and agree that SFR's Response to the Motions be filed on or before December 18, 2017. 4. This is the first request for an extension of these deadlines and it is not made for the purposes of delay. The additional time requested is to allow counsel to meaningfully resolve, in part, the discovery dispute.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The reply is due December 26, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer