Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SWANN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 13-928V. (2014)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20150108994 Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1 MASTER MORAN, Special Master. On November 18, 2014, respondent filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Michael Swann on November 22, 2013. In his petition, Mr. Swann alleged that the influenza, diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis ("DTaP"), Hepatitis A ("Hep A"), Hepatitis B ("Hep B"), and/or varicella vaccines, which are contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. 100.3(a), and which he received on November 26
More

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

MASTER MORAN, Special Master.

On November 18, 2014, respondent filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Michael Swann on November 22, 2013. In his petition, Mr. Swann alleged that the influenza, diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis ("DTaP"), Hepatitis A ("Hep A"), Hepatitis B ("Hep B"), and/or varicella vaccines, which are contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a), and which he received on November 26, 2010, and February 15, 2012, caused his alleged Guillain-Barré Syndrome ("GBS"). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome ("GBS") as a result of the influenza vaccine, and alleges that he experienced a recurrent and/or aggravation of his GBS as a result of his subsequent DTaP, Hep A, Hep B, and/or varicella vaccines. Petitioner further alleges that he experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

Respondent denies that petitioner's influenza vaccine caused GBS or any other injury. Respondent further denies that petitioner's DTaP, Hep A, Hep B, and/or varicella vaccines caused the recurrence and/or aggravation of his GBS or any other injury.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as "Appendix A." The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum of $67,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Michael Swann. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 13-928V according to this decision and the attached stipulation.2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes, at (202) 357-6353.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Petitioner, Michael Swann, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to 34 (the "Vaccine Program."). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of influenza, diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis ("DTaP"), Hepatitis A ("Hep A"), Hepatitis B ("Hep B"), and/or varicella vaccines, which are contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"). 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received an influenza vaccine on November 26, 2010; he received DTaP. Hep A, Hep B. and varicella vaccines on February 15, 2012.

3. The vaccines were administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome ("GBS") as a result of the influenza vaccine, and alleges that he experienced a recurrence and/or aggravation of his GBS as a result of his subsequent DTaP, Hep A, Hop B, and/or varicella vaccines. Petitioner further alleges that he experienced residual effects of his GBS for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his injuries.

6. Respondent denies that petitioner's influenza vaccine caused GBS or any other injury. Respondent further denies that petitioner's DTIP, Hep A, Hep 13, and/or varicella vaccines caused the recurrence and/or aggravation of his GBS or any other injury.

7. Maintaining, their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of 567,500.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case; and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and his attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies. Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XLX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 of this Stipulation and any amounts awarded pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award for attorneys' fees and litigation costs, and past unreimbursed expenses, the money provided pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of petitioner as contemplated by a strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g) and (h).

13. In return for the payments described in paragraphs 8 and 9, petitioner, in his individual capacity, and on behalf of his heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, does forever irrevocably and unconditionally release, acquit and discharge the United States and the Secretary of Health and Human Services from any and all actions or causes of action (including agreements, judgments, claims, damages, loss of services, expenses and all demands of whatever kind or nature) that have been brought, could have been brought, or could be timely brought in the Court of Federal Claims, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq., on account of, or in any way growing out of, any and all known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected personal injuries to or death of petitioner resulting from, or alleged to have resulted from, the influenza vaccination administered on November 26. 2010, and the DTaP, Hep A, Hep B. and varicella vaccines administered on February 15, 2012, as alleged by petitioner in a petition for vaccine compensation filed on or about November 22, 2013, in the United States Court of Federal Claims as petition No. 13-928V.

14. If petitioner should die prior to entry of judgment, this agreement shall be voidable upon proper notice to the Court on behalf of either or both of the parties.

15. If the special master fails to issue a decision in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation or if the Court of Federal Claims fails to enter judgment in conformity with a decision that is in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation, then the parties settlement and this Stipulation shall be voidable at the sole discretion of either party.

16. This Stipulation expresses a fall and complete negotiated settlement of liability and damages claimed under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, except as otherwise noted in paragraph 9 above. There is absolutely no agreement on the part of the parties hereto to make any payment or to do any act or thing other than is herein expressly stated and clearly agreed to. The parties further agree and understand that the award described in this Stipulation may reflect a compromise of the parties' respective positions as to liability and/or amount of damages, and farther, that a change in the nature of the injury or condition or in the items of compensation sought, is not grounds to modify or revise this agreement.

17. This Stipulation shall not be construed as an admission by the United States or the Secretary of Health and Human Services that the influenza, DTaP, Hep A, Hep B, and/or varicella vaccines caused petitioner to develop GBS or any other injury, or that any vaccine(s) caused the recurrence or aggravation of GBS or any other injury.

18. All rights and obligations of petitioner hereunder shall apply equally to petitioner's heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and/or assigns.

FootNotes


1. The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the party has 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.
2. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer