Filed: Jun. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2015
Summary: DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES AND ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS 1 DENISE KATHRYN VOWELL , Chief Special Master . On November 14, 2014, Antoinette McCormick filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq, 2 [the "Vaccine Act" or "Program"]. The petition alleges that as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccination on December 7, 2013, petitioner suffered "shoulder injuries which were caused in fact" by her influenza vaccinat
Summary: DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES AND ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS 1 DENISE KATHRYN VOWELL , Chief Special Master . On November 14, 2014, Antoinette McCormick filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq, 2 [the "Vaccine Act" or "Program"]. The petition alleges that as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccination on December 7, 2013, petitioner suffered "shoulder injuries which were caused in fact" by her influenza vaccinati..
More
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES AND ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS1
DENISE KATHRYN VOWELL, Chief Special Master.
On November 14, 2014, Antoinette McCormick filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10, et seq,2 [the "Vaccine Act" or "Program"]. The petition alleges that as a result of an influenza ("flu") vaccination on December 7, 2013, petitioner suffered "shoulder injuries which were caused in fact" by her influenza vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.
On April 29, 2015, I issued a ruling on entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ["SIRVA"]. On June 17, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ["Proffer"] detailing compensation in the amount of $90,000.00 for actual and projected pain and suffering.
The proffer also included an award of attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $14,546.62 to which petitioner agreed. Id. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner's counsel asserts that petitioner incurred no out-of-pocket litigation expenses. Id. The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300 aa-15(e). I find the proposed total amount of $14,546.62 to be reasonable.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award petitioner a payment of $104,546.62 as follows:
• a lump sum payment of $90,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Antoinette McCormick;
• a lump sum payment of $14,546.62 in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner, Antoinette McCormick and petitioner's counsel, Paul Brazil.
This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
I. Items of Compensation
For the purposes of this proffer, the term "vaccine-related" is as described in Respondent's Rule 4(c) Report filed on April 27, 2015.
A. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $90,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.
B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Petitioner has not submitted documentation for unreimbursed expenses in this case, and thus respondent proffers that petitioner should not be awarded any amount for unreimbursed expenses. Petitioner agrees.
C. Lost Wages
The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, petitioner's vaccine-related injury has not impaired her earning capacity. Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded no lost future earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.
D. Attorney's Fees and Costs
Petitioner has supplied documentation of reasonable attorney's fees and litigation costs in the amount of $14,546.62, incurred in pursuit of this petition. In compliance with General Order #9, petitioner has indicated that she did not incur any out-of-pocket expenses in proceeding on the petition. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $14,546.62 for attorney's fees and costs. Petitioner agrees.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that compensation provided to petitioner should be made through lump sum payments as described below and request that the Chief Special Master's decision and the Court's judgment award the following:1
A. A lump sum payment of $90,000.00, which represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)., in the form of a check payable to petitioner; and
B. A lump sum payment of $14,546.62, in the form of a check payable to petitioner and petitioner's attorney, Paul Brazil, Esq., for attorney's fees and costs. Petitioner agrees to endorse this payment to petitioner's attorney.
III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment
A. Lump sum paid to petitioner: $90,000.00
B. Reasonable Attorney's Fees and Costs: $14,546.62
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN C. MIZER
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
Deputy Director
Tort Branch, Civil Division
MICHAEL P. MILMOE
Senior Trial Counsel
Torts Branch, Civil Division
s/Alexis B. Babcock
ALEXIS B. BABCOCK
Senior Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Benjamin Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Dated: June 17, 2015 Telephone: (202) 616-7678