TURPIN v. WELLPOINT COMPANIES, INC., 11-1053. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110523121
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 23, 2011
Latest Update: May 23, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Conchita M. Turpin seeks to appeal the district court's order denying her motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545-46 (1949). The order Turpin seeks to appeal is neither a final order
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Conchita M. Turpin seeks to appeal the district court's order denying her motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545-46 (1949). The order Turpin seeks to appeal is neither a final order ..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Conchita M. Turpin seeks to appeal the district court's order denying her motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Turpin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
