ANDERSON v. BRAZELTON, CV 13-6135-GW (PLA). (2015)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20150211958
Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GEORGE H. WU, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, the magistrate judge's second report and recommendation, and petitioner's objections to the second report and recommendation. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the second report and recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the recommendation
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GEORGE H. WU, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, the magistrate judge's second report and recommendation, and petitioner's objections to the second report and recommendation. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the second report and recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the recommendations..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, the magistrate judge's second report and recommendation, and petitioner's objections to the second report and recommendation. The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the second report and recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the recommendations of the magistrate judge.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:
1. The second report and recommendation is accepted.
2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.
3. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record.
Source: Leagle
