Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Strickland v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-0269V. (2018)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20181025995 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2018
Summary: UNPUBLISHED RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On February 21, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioners alleges that E.S. suffered Parsonage-Turner Syndrome, also known as brachial neuritis, and/or a shoulder injury as a result of Diphtheria Tetanus acellular Pertussis ("DTaP"), Hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenza type b ("Hib
More

UNPUBLISHED

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On February 21, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioners alleges that E.S. suffered Parsonage-Turner Syndrome, also known as brachial neuritis, and/or a shoulder injury as a result of Diphtheria Tetanus acellular Pertussis ("DTaP"), Hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenza type b ("Hib"), Polio Inactivated Virus ("IPV"), and Pneumococcal Conjugate vaccinations administered on September 6, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 17, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent's Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Respondent states that the Division of Injury Compensation Programs, Department of Health and Human Services has concluded that E.S. suffered a Table injury under the Vaccine Act. Id. at 9. Specifically, respondent agrees that E.S. suffered brachial neuritis, the onset of which occurred within two to twenty-eight days following his September 6, 2016 DTaP vaccination Id. Respondent further agrees that E.S.'s medical records show that he suffered the sequela of his injury for more than six months after vaccination and has met the statutory requirements for entitlement to compensation. Id.

In view of respondent's position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer