Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TAYLOR v. PEPSICO, INC., 6:16-cv-597-Orl-37GJK. (2016)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20160422c82 Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER ROY B. DALTON, Jr. , District Judge . This cause is before the Court on its own motion. This action was removed from state court on April 7, 2016. (Doc. 1.) On April 12, 2016, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint as an impermissible shotgun pleading and directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint on or before Wednesday, April 27, 2016. (Doc. 6.) Upon further review, the Court takes notice of Defendant's representation that: (1) Plaintiff has named the wrong defendant; (2) P
More

ORDER

This cause is before the Court on its own motion. This action was removed from state court on April 7, 2016. (Doc. 1.) On April 12, 2016, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's Complaint as an impermissible shotgun pleading and directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint on or before Wednesday, April 27, 2016. (Doc. 6.)

Upon further review, the Court takes notice of Defendant's representation that:

(1) Plaintiff has named the wrong defendant; (2) Pepsi Beverages Company ("PBC") is the proper defendant; and (3) PBC is "willing to accept service of an Amended Complaint naming the proper defendant." (See Doc. 1, p. 1, n.1.)

In the absence of evidence to the contrary, Plaintiff is DIRECTED to name Pepsi Beverages Company as the proper defendant in his anticipated forthcoming amended complaint, which remains due on or before Wednesday, April 27, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer